True, a cricket match cannot be won by the sentiments of the billion plus Indians who are, in themselves, the greatest experts of the game! It still remains a mystery as to why a man who has conceded over 160 runs in less than 30 overs while grabbing 4 wickets at an average of 40 to some of the weakest cricketing nations is still an integral part of this Indian cricket team. Yes, it is Piyush Chawla. I am one of those who was, and still is, screaming hoarse about the inclusion of arguably the weakest link in the bowling line-up that has been put up to face some of the strongest sides. It is even more disconcerting when the wise men seem to turn a blind eye to this man’s repeated failures! Every talk show before and after the match results in many exponents predicting that Chawla is clearly on his way out, or atleast requires to do much more to play another game in this World Cup! But, alas, all these have fallen on deaf ears, and the think tank insists
on playing match after match, where even the ‘minnowest of the minnows’ dare to take on the team that is ‘Numero Uno’ in one day cricket. But Chawla has done something very special! With his poor performance in each match, what he has done is to take away all the media glare from an extremely lacklustre Harbhajan, who is surprisingly touted as India’s number one off spinner! True, Bhajji has been a great performer for India over the past decade, but does it put him above question? Is the role of a spinner in the Indian cricket team to curtail the flow of runs or to run through the opposition’s batting line up? For a tournament of this stature and in this country, I would say it’s the latter. Which brings us to the question of the tournament – is Chawla being retained to protect Bhajji? Or is the confidence in him justified as ‘just a temporary drop in form’?
An elephant has 2 sets of teeth – one for eating and the other to show the world – old Indian proverb!
on playing match after match, where even the ‘minnowest of the minnows’ dare to take on the team that is ‘Numero Uno’ in one day cricket. But Chawla has done something very special! With his poor performance in each match, what he has done is to take away all the media glare from an extremely lacklustre Harbhajan, who is surprisingly touted as India’s number one off spinner! True, Bhajji has been a great performer for India over the past decade, but does it put him above question? Is the role of a spinner in the Indian cricket team to curtail the flow of runs or to run through the opposition’s batting line up? For a tournament of this stature and in this country, I would say it’s the latter. Which brings us to the question of the tournament – is Chawla being retained to protect Bhajji? Or is the confidence in him justified as ‘just a temporary drop in form’?
An elephant has 2 sets of teeth – one for eating and the other to show the world – old Indian proverb!